By contrast, Harry Hakam's letters use strong, provocative, aggressive language. He sexually harasses the girl: " So watch out for I have big teeth and generally have a little red riding hood with my eggs for breakfast." He is even less subtle with the fact that he uses her for cigarettes. He writes: "P.S.- mucho love pero much más cuando it gives some more cigarettes pronto." His unsubtle writing is brutal and disrespectful- at least that is how I would feel if I were Marjorie.
However, it is suggested that Marjorie provoked this kind of response by being rather flirtatious herself. Harry wrote "From the way you write, I am tempted to call you my cute little provocative sweetie."
Therefore, it is very difficult to determine how these correspondences between Marjorie and the American soldiers reflects gender relation issues inherent in American culture in the 1930's. Perhaps Marjorie's flirtations with the soldiers were purely acts of compassion made by a remarkable young girl and the soldiers' aggressive and disrespectful attitudes were simply reflections of the unique condition of the disillusioned soldier. Perhaps not. Perhaps American gender relations factors in to the sometimes disturbing and inappropriate correspondence between this American teenage girl and the adult soldiers.
very interesting post. i hadn't really thought a lot about the implications for gender in the correspondence.
ReplyDeleteI agree-- I think this is really important. The role of woman on the "home front" as a support, and it sounds like, outlet for extra energy. This could be traced as a tradition from WWI. I know that women in Germany during WWI saw themselves as conducting a "home front" war struggle-- a completely new idea for a new type of war ("total" war, although this term has been called into question). I do not know much about America and WWI, but I would assume that a similar trend of a "home front" developed. And if not, there was certainly enough discussion of the German "home front" in the global community to potentially be an influence. And then we see a sort of continuation in WWII.
ReplyDeleteI wonder, to what extent the girl identified herself as being a "home front", beyond just a penpal? I.e. a type of soldier herself.
I wonder who started the flirting? Why is her relationship with the other man different? If she started flirting with some of them, why not all of them? It makes me think that the man probably started it, and she just goes along with it. Sort of like entertaining the drunk jerk at a party for a bit, because you feel bad for him? I.e. she identified possibly that she was in a position to provide that little emotional/energetic release for a soldier, and as a woman on the home front, felt an obligation to fulfill it?
Just an idea. You clearly can't tell from just once source, but maybe you should be asking about the *agency* of women at home in the *war* effort too.