From watching interviews with two women who grew up during the Spanish Civil War, Luz Castaños and Vara B. Williams, I got a better sense of how young people were affected by the communities in which they grew up. Liberalism and activism was very prominent in New York City at this time and it's prominence seemed to have created a circular affect in which those growing up in such a highly liberal community became impassioned by the same concerns and beliefs themselves. Thus, support for the Spanish Civil War was spread not only through political activism but through community solidarity as well. Vara B. Williams recalls that her active support for the Spanish Civil War was "wreathed in a certain romanticism"- she believed she was "supporting heroes" and fighting "bad guys" and never really understood the larger political situation and ideological conflicts involved. The community created a simple romanticism which youth in particular could stand behind. Luz Costaños's first childhood memory, in fact, is a Republican song that she sang at the age of one and a half that has the words "salieron por la calle gritando: Liberta! Liberta! Liberta!" This shows how children were shaped by their families and communities. However, Luz also recalls how families and communites were split by political beliefs. Her father was a Republican and second cousin, whom she loved very much, was "the most right wing person in all of New York City".
Other stories in the video seem to demonstrate this idea that the people of New York City were shaped by their communities, not just their personal political beliefs. Milton Wolff says that he was in the Youth Communist League because "I was an activist" and "there were very nice girls there too." Abe Osheroff admits that it was "easy to get politicized" in his hometown of Williamsburg because he was "living it all the time" and "reading left press all of the time." He admits that one of the main forces that led to his departure for Spain was shame. All of his friends were going, and he knew that if he didn't go he would be ashamed for the rest of his life. For many of these people, being politically left and activist was a way of life, not just an ideology; their ideological beliefs and actions were fostered and nourished by a community of people who could share and live together. Could New York City activism have been as strong if this community did not exist? How essential is a community to the formation of political and personal identities?
great post, great final question.
ReplyDeleteYou wrote: "Vara B. Williams recalls that her active support for the Spanish Civil War was "wreathed in a certain romanticism"- she believed she was "supporting heroes" and fighting "bad guys" and never really understood the larger political situation and ideological conflicts involved."
ReplyDeleteI think that this is interesting. The need to villanise the bad guys, and fight, although you may or may not completely understand what *for* or *about*. A strong trend in war-time societies-- example: our own.
Also, how traditionally Marxist are NYC communists? Who are they reading? What names do they drop? Who do they quote? It sounds like they are pretty traditional, in that they see theory leading directly to action (Rosa Luxemburg wrote about this). So, is the same a societal thing, or a Marxist ideological thing?
This also goes into my last post and our most recent discussion: Marxist see themselves at this time as being a part of an "international" and they are all "acting" together to achieve their international goals. If woman at home are supporting the soldiers, they are most likely understanding their actions in terms of this international framework. And therefore, DO see themselves as agents in the fight, just fighting at a different place.
Let me know what names they are dropping and I can give you some essays and background information on the theories that they are participating in (I say participating because theories were supposed to become directly *action*). I have a great book on all the major currents of Marxism and I can scan a chapter or two to you.
Your question of what these folks were reading is an interesting one. It's a diverse group and though I'm sure that some were reading the founding texts of Marxism and soviet communism, my overall sense is that many of them became affiliated with communism more through the actions of the party in the US, than by theoretical readings. In letter after letter, they say that the communists were the only ones that were organizing and doing things to improve the abject living conditions of the Depression's victims; that the CP was the only serious organization opposed to racism, and willing to fight to support civil rights for African Americans, etc. I recall few quotations of Lenin or Marx, but lots of allusions to pamphlets, films and the pages of the Daily Worker. Thanks for the post.
ReplyDelete